The National Preventive Mechanism is a legal institution for the protection of human rights in the Republic of Kazakhstan

2025

Закрытый доступ Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.31489/2025l2/77-86
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

The article discusses the legal regulation issues in the National Preventive Mechanism in the Republic of Ka-zakhstan. The activities of the National Preventive Mechanism are considered a legal institution of great im-portance for torture prevention, as well as cruel treatment and punishment, conditioned by international standards implemented in national legislation. The research purpose is to analyze the legal institute’s “Na-tional Preventive Mechanism”, identifying legal regulation problems in its activities and developing ways to overcome them. The research is carried out through general scientific and special legal methods, using analy-sis and theoretical provisions and legal norms generalization and the implementation practice. Based on the comparative legal process, the main trends in developing the National Preventive Mechanism Institute are currently being identified. The analysis of the specifics of the National Preventive Mechanism in Kazakhstan and its consolidation in legal acts and international standards is carried out. Main result of the research is the provision on the need to improve legal measures aimed at harmonizing national legislation in the prevention of torture with international standards in this area. The conclusions suggest the development and improve-ment of legal norms that specify the procedure for conducting preventive visits by members of the National Preventive Mechanism, as well as the procedure for financing and ensuring the independence of the human rights institution activities.