CONFISCATION AND SUSTAINABLE MANAGEMENT: LAW ENFORCEMENT AGENCIES AND LOCAL COMMUNITIES IN SOVIET-ERA KAZAKHSTAN (1927-1932)

2024

Закрытый доступ Метаданные (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.5593/sgem2024v/4.2/s20.56
Достоверность данных 70 средняя
Как считается эта оценка

Складывается из проверяемых признаков самой записи: есть ли у статьи DOI, сколько независимых источников подтвердили её данные, заполнены ли обязательные поля и насколько свежо последнее подтверждение. Снижают оценку расхождения между источниками и отсутствие идентификатора. Значение от 80 означает, что запись опубликована без дополнительной проверки; от 60 до 79 — что она опубликована с пониженной достоверностью и ручная проверка желательна. Запись, выверенную редактором вручную, пересчёт не опускает ниже 90. Это оценка наших данных о статье, а не оценка самой статьи.

Аннотация

The article investigates the influence of Kazakhstan�s law enforcement agencies on local communities in the 1920s and 1930s within the context of state-driven confiscation policies and sustainable resource management, demonstrating how these agencies emerged as powerful instruments for implementing governmental directives. This era is marked by extensive political repression and profound social transformations, which enforced the forced expropriation of lands, resources, and means of production. Such interventions disrupted established economic practices and social structures, leading to substantial shifts in the livelihood systems of the population and destabilizing their long-term resilience. The relevance of this research lies in its potential to inform contemporary strategies by critically examining historical precedents. Specifically, it underscores the need to develop modern frameworks for state engagement with local communities, as well as principles for sustainable development that uphold the rights and interests of these populations. The primary aim of this study is to analyze the underlying causes and consequences of repressive policies, the roles and functions of law enforcement bodies in executing these policies, and to evaluate the long-term impacts, including resource depletion and ecological degradation. The findings indicate that confiscation policies introduced novel social and environmental challenges, complicating local communities' capacity for adaptation. This analysis highlights the importance of historical insights as a basis for crafting approaches that promote both environmental sustainability and social welfare. Utilizing lessons from past state-community interactions can guide more effective, balanced policies that foster economic stability while ensuring sustainable community development and ecological integrity.