Аңдатпа
Although smart-city benchmarking has produced many indices and rankings, cities still lack a practical way to assess whether successful initiatives can be transferred across institutional contexts and converted into implementable urban roadmaps. In this study, we aimed to develop and empirically test a paired donor–recipient “problem–solution” methodology that bridges comparative city analysis with implementation readiness gap assessment, addressing the persistent disconnect between smart-city benchmarking and actionable transfer guidance. The smart-city ecosystem was decomposed into eight functional dimensions covering digital foundations, service platforms, finance and procurement, innovation capacity, governance, legal adaptability, and citizen participation. The method was applied to the Ottawa-Astana pair using a systematic desk-based analysis of publicly available strategic documents, legislation and policy frameworks, and implementation materials (e.g., roadmaps, program guidelines, departmental plans, and monitoring outputs). Data were analyzed using a structured gap analysis algorithm employing a three-level qualitative compliance scale (Full Compliance, Partial Compliance, and Non-compliance) to assess recipient city status against donor benchmarks across all eight functional dimensions. The results reveal Astana’s partial compliance with the Ottawa benchmark, with moderate readiness and pronounced “hard-soft” asymmetry; that is, greater progress in regard to infrastructure and platforms, but persistent gaps in adaptive regulation, experimentation-friendly legal instruments, and participatory governance. These findings suggest that progressing toward a Smart City 2.0 model requires prioritizing regulatory sandboxes, adaptive procurement pathways for pilots, and scalable civic-tech mechanisms alongside continued investment in talent and innovation ecosystems—understood here as interconnected networks of universities, technology parks, civic-tech communities, and incubation infrastructure that collectively sustain capacity for technology absorption and local adaptation. The proposed paired framework is replicable and supports phased, actionable transfer roadmaps for policymakers.