Modified allogeneic great saphenous vein cold-stored in custodiol for neo-MHV reconstruction in right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation: Early patency in a single-center retrospective cohort

2026

Толық мәтін Ашық қол жеткізу: Gold Метадеректер (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.29333/ejgm/19441
Деректер сенімділігі 70 орташа
Бұл баға қалай есептеледі

Ол жазбаның өзінің тексерілетін белгілерінен құралады: мақаланың DOI-і бар ма, оның деректерін қанша тәуелсіз дереккөз растады, міндетті өрістер толтырылған ба және соңғы растау қаншалықты жаңа. Дереккөздер арасындағы алшақтық пен идентификатордың болмауы бағаны төмендетеді. 80-нен бастап мән жазбаның қосымша тексерусіз жарияланғанын, 60-тан 79-ға дейін — оның сенімділігі төмен күйде жарияланғанын және қолмен тексеру ұсынылатынын білдіреді. Редактор қолмен тексерген жазбаны қайта есептеу 90-нан төмен түсірмейді. Бұл — мақаланың өзіне емес, ол туралы деректерімізге берілген баға.

Аңдатпа

In right-lobe living-donor liver transplantation (LDLT), adequate venous outflow of the anterior sector (V5/V8 tributaries) is critical to prevent congestion and early graft dysfunction. The choice of conduit for V5/V8 outflow reconstruction with creation of a neo-middle hepatic vein (MHV) remains a practical limitation, especially in the setting of a shortage of deceased-donor vascular allografts. The aim of this study was to describe the technical feasibility and early patency of a modified allogeneic great saphenous vein (GSV) cold-stored in custodiol and to explore its outcomes relative to recipient portal vein and prosthetic conduit cohorts. We conducted a retrospective single-center comparative cohort study covering the period from 2014 to 2025. Adult recipients aged 18-60 years who underwent right-lobe LDLT with V5 and/or V8 outflow reconstruction using a neo-MHV conduit were included: recipient PV (n = 63), prosthesis (n = 11), modified GSV (n = 16). The primary endpoint was obstruction of the re-constructed V5/V8 outflow through the neo-MHV conduit within 45 days, classified as early (≤ 7 days) or late ( > 7 days). Patency was assessed by serial Doppler ultrasound and/or contrast-enhanced imaging. Time-to-event analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Overall outflow obstruction within 45 days was observed in 25.4% of the recipient PV group, 45.5% of the prosthesis group, and 6.2% of the modified GSV group (p = 0.063). In an exploratory Firth logistic regression adjusted for calendar year and selected baseline and graft characteristics, the overall association between conduit type and 45-day outflow obstruction was not statistically significant (p = 0.318). The probability of obstruction-free patency on day 7 was 0.804, 0.727, and 0.938, respectively; by day 45, it was 0.733, 0.468, and 0.938, respectively. Observed group-level differences included shorter cold ischemia time (38 [35; 42] min; p = 0.001), a shorter anhepatic period (42 [26; 61] min; p < 0.001), and lower blood loss (1,200 [775; 1,500] mL; p = 0.006) in the modified GSV group. Postoperative hospital stay was also shorter (18 [15; 21] days; p = 0.011), and peak AST, ALT, and INR values were lower (p = 0.039, p = 0.021, and p = 0.027, respectively). The rate of any postoperative complications did not differ significantly (p = 0.439). In-hospital mortality was 19.0% in the recipient PV group, 36.4% in the prosthesis group, and 0% in the modified GSV group (p = 0.053). In this retrospective and temporally heterogeneous cohort, modified allogeneic GSV was technically feasible and demonstrated encouraging early neo-MHV conduit patency. Because conduit allocation was non-random, the groups were small and noncontemporaneous, and important baseline and procedural differences were present, the observed associations cannot be attributed to conduit materi-al and do not establish superiority. Further prospective evaluation is warranted.