Recurrent Graph Attention over Longitudinal Brain Networks Predicts Conversion from Mild Cognitive Impairment to Alzheimer’s Disease

Machine Learning and Knowledge Extraction, 2026

Толық мәтін Ашық қол жеткізу: Gold Метадеректер (CSL-JSON)
DOI 10.3390/make8090285
Деректер сенімділігі 70 орташа
Бұл баға қалай есептеледі

Ол жазбаның өзінің тексерілетін белгілерінен құралады: мақаланың DOI-і бар ма, оның деректерін қанша тәуелсіз дереккөз растады, міндетті өрістер толтырылған ба және соңғы растау қаншалықты жаңа. Дереккөздер арасындағы алшақтық пен идентификатордың болмауы бағаны төмендетеді. 80-нен бастап мән жазбаның қосымша тексерусіз жарияланғанын, 60-тан 79-ға дейін — оның сенімділігі төмен күйде жарияланғанын және қолмен тексеру ұсынылатынын білдіреді. Редактор қолмен тексерген жазбаны қайта есептеу 90-нан төмен түсірмейді. Бұл — мақаланың өзіне емес, ол туралы деректерімізге берілген баға.

Аңдатпа

Predicting progression from mild cognitive impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) requires models that represent both regional brain abnormalities and their evolution across repeated examinations. We developed a longitudinal graph neural network that integrates structural magnetic resonance imaging, FDG-PET, regional imaging biomarkers, and clinical covariates across irregular follow-up visits. The study included 614 participants with baseline MCI from the Alzheimer’s Disease Neuroimaging Initiative: 218 converters to AD within five years and 396 non-converters, with 2438 eligible longitudinal visits. Each visit was represented as an 82-node brain graph based on the Desikan–Killiany atlas. Node features combined a 128-dimensional multimodal convolutional embedding with four regional biomarkers. Graph-attention layers modelled spatial dependencies, a node-wise gated recurrent unit modelled longitudinal dependencies, and masked temporal self-attention aggregated variable-length visit sequences. Participants were divided at the subject level into development and held-out test sets, and hyperparameters were selected by five-fold cross-validation within the development set. On the held-out test set of 123 participants, the model reached an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.859 (95% CI 0.795–0.915), balanced accuracy of 0.805 (95% CI 0.736–0.862), sensitivity of 0.781, and specificity of 0.832. The AUC was numerically higher than that of the strongest baseline, a CNN–GRU sequence model, which reached 0.832 (95% CI 0.758–0.894); the paired AUC difference was 0.027 (95% CI 0.009–0.098), the unadjusted DeLong p-value was 0.026, and the Holm-adjusted p-value was 0.052, which was not significant at the conventional 0.05 threshold after correction for multiple comparisons. In ablation experiments, removing temporal modelling reduced the AUC to 0.818, and removing the spatial graph structure reduced it to 0.808, the two largest reductions observed. Integrated-gradient analysis placed the highest importance on hippocampal and entorhinal regions. Combining graph-based spatial modelling with recurrent longitudinal reasoning was associated with higher discrimination than sequence modelling alone, though this difference was not statistically significant after correction for multiple comparisons. Validation was restricted to a single research cohort (ADNI), and no independent external dataset was used; prospective external validation on an independent cohort is required before the model can be considered for clinical use Because FDG-PET was unavailable for 19.3% of visits, we report the headline result separately from a sensitivity analysis restricted to participants with complete FDG-PET at every visit (development set cross-validated AUC 0.891 vs. 0.874 for the full cohort with masked missing FDG-PET); multimodal performance should be read as cohort-dependent rather than as a single unconditional figure.