Аңдатпа
Public councils are advisory-consultative bodies embedded in the public administration system of Central Asian countries. The existing scholarly literature criticizes the operation of public councils as exhibiting limited effectiveness and tends to view them as symbolic. This study focuses on Kyrgyzstan’s public councils, which functioned from 2014 to 2024, and examines the factors that influenced their performance. This research uses a qualitative case study research design, which includes data collected through focus groups, semi-structured interviews, and secondary data. This inquiry applies the framework developed by Abelson et al. (2003), including four criteria: representation, procedural rules, information, and outcomes. These criteria are designed for the evaluation of public participation processes. During data collection, participants were asked questions related to these four criteria and factors that influence them. Findings show that to fulfill requirements on representation, fair procedural rules, access to information, and influence of public council members’ voices on outcomes, three conditions should be met. First, the political will of the government and openness to public council inputs are the key factors. Selected line ministries of Kyrgyzstan were open to inputs of public councils and did not impose constraints on their operation. Second, the strength of civil society played an essential role. Independent media and active civil society representatives joined the public councils to bring changes to reforms. Third, social capital and horizontal relationships at the society level also contribute to public councils’ performance. These findings demonstrate that, given plausible conditions and resources, public councils in Central Asia can demonstrate effective performance.