Аңдатпа
This article is devoted to the topic of nomadism.In the mainstream of post-non-classical rationality, nomadism should be considered in three aspects: socio-cultural, philosophical, and transcultural. The purpose of this article is to consider three approaches to understanding the phenomenon of nomadism in the context of post-non-classical rationality. In the first case, nomadism is considered as a special type of organization of a social super-system with a specific type of management and existence. In the second case, it is a reassembly of the scientific picture of the world, in accordance with which the rhizomatic potential of knowledge is built up. In the third case, we are dealing with the phenomenon of translingualism as one of the manifestations of the cultural mobility of a writer who is in a transposition between two linguacultures. The methods we used, such as descriptive analysis, text sampling, translingual analysis of a literary text, became relevant tools for the work, thanks to which we were able to confirm the hypothesis we put forward. Each of these methods can become a productive way of experiencing and interpreting a literary work. The results of the work are that three vectors of nomadism research in the context of the interpretation of the artistic text have been identified, which significantly enriches our understanding of the phenomenon under study. For the first time in a scientific work, the term “nomadism” is not only considered as a historical or philosophical category but is also used to decipher translingual and post-structural texts. The results of this approach will help to overcome the immanence of classical literary analysis, as its instrumentarium is expanded. The practical value of the work is also due to the fact that in the analysis of the empirical material the key principle is the rhizomaticity of both the text itself and the arsenal of its decipherment.